Fixed price • 2 days • £4,500

Find where your AI rollout will stall.
Before you spend.

Two days on the rollout you're about to run. You leave with one document: where the constraint will move when it ships, and the three things to change before it does. From someone who runs the post-mortems for a living.

£4,500 fixed, one invoice. The £750 Maturity Review is credited in full against it within 30 days.

Where rollouts stall

I spend most of my time diagnosing rollouts after they stall, and the post-mortems rhyme. Pilots rarely die in the model. They die in three places, none of which appear in a demo:

Verification

Who checks the output, and is that cheaper than doing the work? Most rollouts never ask, and the answer arrives later as senior-management overload.

Workflow joins

The new thing does step three brilliantly while steps two and four still assume the old way. Pilots die at the joins, not in the model.

Decision rights

When the output is wrong, whose name is on it? If nobody can answer before launch, the rollout stalls at the first mistake.

The mechanism has a name, constraint migration: speed up one part of the work without redesigning the rest and the limit does not disappear, it moves. The pre-mortem finds where it will move before you have paid to find out.

Not only AI

AI is the most common reason the meeting happens. It is not what moves the constraint. Anything that makes one part of the system faster or different without redesigning the rest does the same thing, so the same two days apply to:

  • An AI or automation rollout: the most common trigger this year, and where the budget usually sits.
  • A platform or system going in: CRM, ERP, case management, a migration.
  • A change of delivery method, a new operating cadence, or a restructure of teams.
  • A reorg, or a change in who decides what.
  • A new supplier, an outsourced step, or headcount scaling into an unchanged process.

Sometimes the honest answer is that more technology would make it worse. The document says so when it is true.

How the two days run

Before anything

One conversation with the person who owns the rollout, and whatever plan exists. A deck, a budget line, or a strong intention all work. Nothing to prepare.

Day 1 to 2

Four to six conversations with the people closest to the handoffs the change will touch. Not a workshop, not a survey. The point is to find the next constraint, not audit the last one.

Within a week

One document: where the constraint will move when this ships, and the three things to change before it does. If a partner introduced me, they get the same paper you do.

Then I leave

You own the document and can act on it without me. If you want the changes run rather than recommended, that is a separate rung and your decision.

What you get

Your three most likely stall points, named

Not a generic checklist. The specific places your rollout, in your organisation, is most likely to stop, mapped against the patterns I diagnose for a living.

What to design differently, now

The changes that cost a conversation today and a write-off in twelve months: the verification step, the workflow join, the accountability line.

Finished when the document lands

Two days, one paper, no implementation tail. Generous enough that a capable team could act on it alone, and most do.

How every engagement runs

Diagnose

Find where the constraint actually sits. Not where the org chart says it should be.

Prove

Build the thing that proves the pathway exists. Working software, not a slide.

Embed

Get it into live use with your people, on real cases, until it is load-bearing without me in the room.

Leave

Every engagement has a defined end. Extension is your choice, never my pitch.

I leave, and it keeps running. If you want a consultant who moves in for eighteen months, I am the wrong person — the whole point is that you don't need me.

Questions you are probably asking

How is this different from the AI Maturity Diagnosis?

Same two days, same diagnostic muscle, run in opposite directions. The Diagnosis measures how far an adoption has actually got and what stopped it moving. The pre-mortem finds where the next one would stop, while changing course still costs a conversation.

We haven’t committed budget yet. Is this premature?

This is exactly when it pays. The three stall points are cheapest to design for before tooling is chosen and pilots are promised. After that, every fix has an audience.

What do you need from us?

Access to four to six people across the handoffs the change will touch, and whatever documentation already exists. Remote by default; on-site by arrangement.

What happens afterwards?

You own the write-up and can act on it without me. If the document points at something worth building, a PoC Sprint or a workshop cohort is the next shape, each with its own fixed price. Extension is your choice, never my pitch.

Putting this at the front of your own proposal to a client? The partners page describes exactly what happens when you introduce me.

Two days now, or a post-mortem later.

£4,500 fixed. Where the constraint will move, and the three things to change, before any of it costs anything.